ORDER MO-4768

Appeal MA25-00772

Toronto Police Services Board

February 19, 2026

Summary: On July 11, 2025, the Toronto Police Services Board received a partially transferred request for records about an individual. The individual appealed because the police did not issue a decision within the prescribed time limit. The decision-maker finds that the police have not issued a final access decision and the request is deemed to have been refused. The police are ordered to issue a final access decision by March 5, 2026.

Statute Considered: Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. M.56 , as amended, sections 19 and 22.

OVERVIEW:

[1] The appellant asked the Ministry of the Solicitor General (the ministry) for access under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act  (the Act ) to records about them and any investigations, surveillance or operational activities involving specified police services and operations.

[2] On July 11, 2025, the ministry partially transferred the access request to the Toronto Police Services Board (the police) under section 25  of the Act .

[3] On August 12, 2025, the appellant appealed to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (the IPC) because the police failed to issue a decision within 30 days of the transfer. File MA25-00772 was opened.

[4] On October 27, 2025, I asked the police whether a final access decision had been issued for this access request.

[5] On October 29, 2025, the police advised that it had not issued a final access decision and expects to do so in at least two weeks.

[6] On November 17, 2025, I followed up with the police. No response was received.

[7] On December 8, 2025, I decided to conduct an expedited inquiry and issued a Notice of Expedited Inquiry, encouraging the police to issue a final access decision by December 22, 2025. A final decision was not issued by this date.

[8] On January 5, 2026, the appellant confirmed that no decision had been issued.

[9] Considering the above, and to ensure there are no further delays in processing this access request, I will order the police to issue a final access decision to the appellant.

DISCUSSION:

[10] Section 19  of the Act  states:

Where a person requests access to a record, the head of the institution to which the request is made or if a request is forwarded or transferred under section 18, the head of the institution to which it is forwarded or transferred, shall, subject to sections 20, 21 and 45, within thirty days after the request is received,

(a) give written notice to the person who made the request as to whether or not access to the record or a part thereof will be given; and

(b) if access is to be given, give the person who made the request access to the record or part thereof, and where necessary for the purpose cause the record to be produced.

[11] The circumstances giving rise to a deemed refusal are set out in section 22(4)  of the Act . This section states:

A head who fails to give notice required under section 19 or subsection 21(7) concerning a record shall be deemed to have given notice of refusal to give access to the record on the last day of the period during which notice should have been given.

[12] Where a time extension is not claimed, or an interim decision/fee estimate is not issued, it is expected that, prior to the expiry of the 30-day time limit in section 19  of the Act , subject to section 21  and 45  of the Act , written notice will be given to the requester as to whether access to the record or a part thereof will be given and for access to the record to then be given to the requester. This is referred to as a final access decision. If a final access decision is not issued prior to the expiry of this 30-day time limit, the institution would be in a “deemed refusal” pursuant to section 22(4)  of the Act .

[13] The police received the partially transferred request on July 11, 2025, from the ministry. The police did not issue an extension of time to respond to the request. As of today, the police have not issued its final access decision despite the appellant filing this appeal with the IPC and me issuing a Notice of Expedited Inquiry, encouraging it to do so by December 22, 2025. As a final decision was not issued to the appellant within 30 days of the access request and no decision has been issued to date, the police are deemed to have refused the access request.

[14] Therefore, I find the police to be in a deemed refusal situation pursuant to section 22(4)  of the Act .

[15] To ensure that there are no further delays, I will order the police to issue a final access decision to the appellant.

ORDER:

1. I order the police to issue a final access decision to the appellant regarding access to the records in accordance with the Act and without recourse to a time extension by March 5, 2026.
2. To verify compliance, the police shall provide me with a copy by email of the decision referred to in provision 1 by March 5, 2026.