Access to Information Orders

Decision Information

Summary:

NATURE OF THE APPEAL: This is an appeal under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act ). On January 27, 2002, the requester submitted a request to the District Municipality of Muskoka (the Municipality) for records relating to the "purchases and/or expenditures made by the Institution under the authorization, direction and/or recommendation of [two named individuals] (1) that did not follow from an advertised open public tender competition process; and (2) that are over $5,000 in size. We would like copies of the following records: The purchase order or requisition to the vendor. The quotations or offers submitted by each vendor proponent (both successful and unsuccessful) in each instance. Documents authored by [two named individuals] commenting on the purchase after the offers were received and prior to the purchase order or requisition being issued to the vendors. We are interested for the time being in the record for the years 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997. Please estimate and quote each year and the named individual's records separately to facilitate narrowing the request, if necessary." The Municipality did not issue a decision letter to the requester as required by sections 19 and 22 of the Act within the 30 days prescribed by the Act , nor did the Municipality request a time extension to process the request under section 20(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the Municipality placed itself in a "deemed refusal" situation pursuant to section 22(4) of the Act . The requester (now the appellant) appealed the Municipality's deemed refusal to provide access to the records. On April 4, 2002, a Notice of Inquiry was issued notifying the Municipality that a "deemed refusal" appeal had been opened, because a decision letter had not been issued to the appellant. The notice indicated that the matter would be mediated, and if settlement was not reached by April 18, 2002, an Order would be issued requiring the Municipality to issue a decision letter to the appellant. I contacted the Municipality but to date, a decision letter has not been issued. ORDER: I order the Municipality to issue a decision letter to the appellant regarding access to the records in accordance with the Act and without recourse to a time extension, no later than April 25, 2002. In order to verify compliance with Provision 1 of this Order, I order the Municipality to provide me with a copy of the decision letter referred to in Provision 1 by April 29, 2002. This should be forwarded to my attention, c/o Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario, 80 Bloor Street West, Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2V1. Original signed by: Leslie McIntyre Acting-Adjudicator April 18, 2002

Decision Content

ORDER MO-1529

 

Appeal MA-020062-1

 

District Municipality of Muskoka


 

NATURE OF THE APPEAL:

 

This is an appeal under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act).

 

On January 27, 2002, the requester submitted a request to the District Municipality of Muskoka (the Municipality) for records relating to the “purchases and/or expenditures made by the Institution under the authorization, direction and/or recommendation of [two named individuals] (1) that did not follow from an advertised open public tender competition process; and (2) that are over $5,000 in size.  We would like copies of the following records:

 

  • The purchase order or requisition to the vendor.

 

  • The quotations or offers submitted by each vendor proponent (both successful and unsuccessful) in each instance.

 

  • Documents authored by [two named individuals] commenting on the purchase after the offers were received and prior to the purchase order or requisition being issued to the vendors.

 

We are interested for the time being in the record for the years 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997.  Please estimate and quote each year and the named individual’s records separately to facilitate narrowing the request, if necessary.”

The Municipality did not issue a decision letter to the requester as required by sections 19 and 22 of the Act within the 30 days prescribed by the Act, nor did the Municipality request a time extension to process the request under section 20(1) of the Act.  Accordingly, the Municipality placed itself in a “deemed refusal” situation pursuant to section 22(4) of the Act.  The requester (now the appellant) appealed the Municipality’s deemed refusal to provide access to the records.

 

On April 4, 2002, a Notice of Inquiry was issued notifying the Municipality that a “deemed refusal” appeal had been opened, because a decision letter had not been issued to the appellant.  The notice indicated that the matter would be mediated, and if settlement was not reached by April 18, 2002, an Order would be issued requiring the Municipality to issue a decision letter to the appellant.

 

I contacted the Municipality but to date, a decision letter has not been issued.  

 

ORDER:

 

1.                  I order the Municipality to issue a decision letter to the appellant regarding access to the records in accordance with the Act and without recourse to a time extension, no later than April 25, 2002.

 

 

 

 

2.                   In order to verify compliance with Provision 1 of this Order, I order the Municipality to provide me with a copy of the decision letter referred to in Provision 1 by April 29, 2002.  This should be forwarded to my attention, c/o Information and Privacy  Commissioner/Ontario, 80 Bloor Street West, Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2V1.

 

 

 

 

 

Original signed by:                                                                        April 18, 2002                                       

Leslie McIntyre

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.