426 result(s)
-
51.
CYFSA DECISION 3 - 2022-02-25
Child, Youth, and Family Information and Privacy - DecisionSections 315(9) and 315(10), referenced in the Mediator’s Report, are not engaged in this complaint because the complainant does not satisfy the requirements for requesting a correction under section 315(2).
-
52.
MO-4170-R - 2022-02-24
Access to Information Orders - Reconsideration Order[4] Additional issues were added to the appeal, including the appellant’s objection to the IPC mediator providing me with the Mediator’s Report and other parts of the township’s access decision. [...] [6] Although several issues were canvassed in the adjudication of the appeal, the Order addressed only the following issues: the appellant’s concerns about the Mediator’s Report, the appellant’s concerns about the township’s lack of a personal information bank index as required by section 34 of the Act, the scope of the [...] [7] I found that the issues raised by the appellant in relation to the Mediator’s Report were unfounded.
-
53.
MO-4160 - 2022-02-11
Access to Information Orders - Order[6] As set out in the Mediator’s Report, during the course of mediation, the city subsequently issued a further supplementary decision letter granting access to explanatory note #7.
-
54.
MO-4159 - 2022-02-07
Access to Information Orders - Order[41] In the present appeal, the appellant reviewed and commented on the Mediator’s Report. [...] [7] Many mediator’s reports contain much more detail than the one at issue here. [...] Mediators do not include confidential mediation discussions in their mediator’s reports.
-
55.
MO-4152-I - 2022-01-20
Access to Information Orders - Order[6] After the initial Mediator’s Report was sent out to the parties, the city conducted another search for responsive records and then disclosed additional information to the appellant. [...] Although the outstanding issue listed in the Mediator’s Report was the application of section 14(1) , the Notice of Inquiry included the issue of whether the records contain “personal information,” as that term is defined in section 2(1) of the Act , and if so, to whom it relates, as this must always be considered before
-
56.
PO-4226 - 2022-01-17
Access to Information Orders - Order[13] I note that these issues are not set out as issues in the Mediator’s Report and they were raised as an issue for the first time at the inquiry stage. [...] In the cover letter of January 12, 2021 to the Mediator’s Report, the appellant was provided with an opportunity to advise the mediator of any errors or omissions in the report by January 22, 2021.
-
57.
MO-4144-R - 2022-01-05
Access to Information Orders - Reconsideration Order[15] The city further submits that it raised this issue during the mediation of the appeal, but this issue was not brought forward to the adjudicator as an outstanding issue in the mediator’s report. [...] [35] The mediator’s report was issued on September 19, 2019 and listed the records at issue as the “a-k” records. [...] The city did not respond to the mediator’s report. [36] During the inquiry of the appeal, the city was provided with the opportunity to provide representations and reply representations on the exemption it in section 14(1) it applied to records described as floor plans, a roof plan, elevation plans, a basement plan, site
-
58.
PO-4224 - 2021-12-23
Access to Information Orders - Order[12] Prior to submitting its representations, the university confirmed that it has disclosed the following pages of the records to the appellant, in full, even though these pages were listed as being at issue in the Mediator’s Report: [...] [13] Also, the original adjudicator noted that although pages 20, 21, 22 and 23 (Phase 2, Faculty of Arts, Group 2) are listed as being at issue in the Mediator’s Report, these records appear in the appeal file as having been disclosed to the appellant.
-
59.
PO-4213-I - 2021-11-25
Access to Information Orders - Order - InterimHowever, when the mediator issued the Mediator’s Report, the appellant claimed that the issue of scope should be added to as an issue. [...] The mediator added the issue of scope to the appeal and issued a Revised Mediator’s Report reflecting the update to the WSIB’s objections. [...] Both the WSIB and the appellant were provided with an opportunity to respond to the Mediator’s Report after it was issued, as is clear by the appellant’s raising of scope of the request as an issue and the subsequent issuance of the Revised Mediator’s Report.
-
60.
PO-4199-R - 2021-10-18
Access to Information Orders - Reconsideration OrderThe remaining issues, as listed in the Mediator’s Report, were the discretionary personal privacy exemption at section 49(b), and the section 49(a) exemption (discretion to refuse access to requester’s own personal information) with section 20 (threat to health or safety).
-
61.
PO-4182 - 2021-08-31
Access to Information Orders - OrderNor is this understanding reflected in the Mediator’s Report or the Notice of Inquiry.
-
62.
PO-4176 - 2021-08-12
Access to Information Orders - Order[16] Based on the circumstances of this appeal and my review of the mediator’s report, the issues are whether TST or Knox are part of the university for the purposes of the Act , and if not, whether the university nevertheless has custody or control of the records under section 10(1) .
-
63.
MO-4091 - 2021-07-29
Access to Information Orders - Order[11] In the interim, the appellant sent an email to the mediator after reviewing the mediator’s report, in which he stated:
-
64.
MO-4088 - 2021-07-27
Access to Information Orders - OrderI have reviewed the Amended Mediator’s Report, all of the representations provided by the appellant and the TTC, including all attachments/exhibits, as well as a report prepared by the TTC that sets out in detail the incident that is the subject matter of this appeal.
-
65.
MO-4078-R - 2021-06-29
Access to Information Orders - Reconsideration OrderThe appellant did not challenge the accuracy of the contents of the mediator’s report, although he had the opportunity to do so.
-
66.
PO-4156-F - 2021-06-08
Access to Information Orders - Order - Final[17] I note that the appellant was provided with a copy of the IPC’s mediator’s report, where the reasonableness of the university’s search was identified as the sole issue in this appeal. [...] [18] In the cover letter to the mediator’s report, the appellant was invited to advise the mediator if there were any errors or omissions in this report, by no later than March 6, 2020. [...] The appellant did not identify any errors or omissions in the mediator’s report.
-
67.
PO-4151 - 2021-05-31
Access to Information Orders - OrderThe appellant’s request, as revised and set out in the mediator’s report referred to above, was for “a copy of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Hearn Generation Station from July of 1999.” The title of the Report at issue is the “Phase II Environmental Site Assessment R.L. Hearn Generating Station
-
68.
PO-4149 - 2021-05-28
Access to Information Orders - Order[19] The responsiveness of the appellant’s WSIB account number was not identified in the Mediator’s Report as an issue for adjudication. [...] [2] While “scope of the request” (section 24) was listed as an issue in the Mediator’s Report, it was only raised with respect to record 81.
-
69.
MO-4047-R - 2021-05-05
Access to Information Orders - Reconsideration OrderThe Mediator’s Report identified the issues of reasonable search and the application of the discretionary personal privacy exemption at section 38 (b) of the Act . [...] [1] The Revised Mediator’s Report also noted that the discretionary personal privacy exemption at section 38 (b) was at issue, but as discussed in greater detail in this order, the appellant confirmed that he was not interested in pursuing access to the withheld personal information of others, before I began the inquiry.
-
70.
MO-4038 - 2021-04-14
Access to Information Orders - OrderThe mediator’s report sets out that in addition to all of the records withheld under sections 38 (a) and 12 the appellants advised that they were seeking access to the following records which were withheld under section 38 (b)/14(1):
-
71.
MO-4037 - 2021-04-07
Access to Information Orders - Order[18] The appellant provided a red folder of documents to the IPC staff member [8] , and left voicemails to the mediator in response to the Mediator’s Report.
-
72.
PO-4247 - 2021-03-25
Access to Information Orders - Order[16] On careful consideration of the request, the ministry’s decision, the mediator’s report and the other material in the file, I concluded, on a preliminary basis, that the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success. [...] I considered the appellant’s request, the ministry’s decision, the mediator’s report and the other information in the file.
-
73.
MO-4027-I - 2021-03-18
Access to Information Orders - Order - InterimWhile I accept that these records were not records created by the police, according to the Mediator’s Report, the basis for the appeal is the appellant’s belief that additional records exist “including” those specified records.
-
74.
MO-4019 - 2021-03-08
Access to Information Orders - Order[6] I note that the TCHC’s decision letter of November 19, 2018, and the Mediator’s Report of March 5, 2019, refer specifically to the exclusion in section 52(3) 3 of the Act , and not those in sections 52(3) 1 or 52(3) 2.
-
75.
MO-4013 - 2021-02-23
Access to Information Orders - Order[5] At mediation, the police maintained their position that they did not have custody or control of the requested record under section 4(1) of the Act , and after receiving the Mediator’s report, confirmed that if they were found to have custody or control, the above-claimed exemptions would apply.