467 result(s)
-
1.
PO-4803 - 2026-03-25
Access to Information Orders - Order[9] Accordingly, I have removed from the scope of the appeal the other issues identified as outstanding in the mediator’s report relating to portions of the records not identified above. In removing these issues from the scope of the appeal, I note that the appellant’s representations did not respond to the ministry’s
-
2.
PO-4804 - 2026-03-25
Access to Information Orders - OrderThe Mediator’s Report notes that the appellant understands that section 23 of the Act does not apply to sections 14 , 19 and 22 of the Act .
-
3.
MO-4779 - 2026-03-19
Access to Information Orders - Order[1] On the basis that information withheld as personal information is close to the information being sought, according to the Mediator’s Report issued at the conclusion of mediation. [2] Orders P-880 and PO-2661.
-
4.
PO-4799 - 2026-03-19
Access to Information Orders - OrderBoth the Mediator’s Report and the Notice of Inquiry identify responsiveness as an issue in this appeal.
-
5.
PO-4783 - 2026-01-30
Access to Information Orders - Order[7] At the end of mediation, the records remaining at issue were identified in the Mediator’s Report as being a polygraph video and transcript, a report the appellant describes as the “Project [H] Report,” created at the conclusion of the joint task force investigation, and the names of on-duty officers that were withheld [...] After reviewing the appeal file and the parties’ representations, I informed the parties that I would only be addressing access to the records identified in the Mediator’s Report and Notices of Inquiry, as there appeared to be confusion in the representations regarding the records remaining at issue. [...] [12] The ministry’s representations address records that are not at issue, namely “search warrants, forensic analyses, exhibit registers [and] operation plans.” Where representations discuss issues outside the records at issue for adjudication as set out in the Mediator’s Report and Notices of Inquiry, I have not summarized
-
6.
PO-4781 - 2026-01-29
Access to Information Orders - OrderThe mediator’s report transferring the appeal to the adjudication stage of the appeals process indicated that the affected party declined to consent and that the appellant wanted to pursue access to the agreement at adjudication. [...] [5] After reviewing the mediator’s report and the record at issue, I advised the ministry and the home that my preliminary view was that the record at issue is an agreement containing negotiated information and that, consequently, section 17(1) of the Act does not apply to it. [...] Section 8.02 states that the adjudicator may consider the information contained in the Mediator’s Report to determine whether the circumstances warrant conducting an inquiry.
-
7.
MO-4745 - 2025-12-19
Access to Information Orders - OrderResponsiveness of information was not an issue that was identified in the IPC mediator’s report, nor was it identified as an issue by the American zoo executive, who is the head of this zoo, in the representations that he submitted at adjudication.
-
8.
PHIPA DECISION 317 - 2025-12-15
Health Information and Privacy - Decision - PHIPA[16] The mediator’s report also identified other issues the complainant raised during mediation. [...] [40] The mediator’s report details the complainant’s frustrations with the custodian’s failure to attach his statements of disagreement with the record in a timely manner.[12]
-
9.
PHIPA DECISION 318 - 2025-12-15
Health Information and Privacy - Decision - PHIPA[13] The mediator’s report also identified another issue the complainant raised during mediation[11].
-
10.
MO-4723 - 2025-11-19
Access to Information Orders - Order[5] Mediation did not resolve the appeal and it was transferred to the adjudication stage of the appeal process, where an adjudicator may conduct an inquiry under the Act. After reviewing the Mediator’s Report, my preliminary view was that the exclusion at section 52(3)3 would clearly apply to the records. [...] Section 8.02 states the adjudicator may consider the information contained in the Mediator’s Report to determine whether the circumstances warrant conducting an inquiry.
-
11.
MO-4714 - 2025-10-24
Access to Information Orders - Order[8] I assigned the record numbers below, based on my review of the Mediator’s Report, the police’s index of records, and the IPC’s 94-page amalgamated copy of the records.
-
12.
PHIPA DECISION 307 - 2025-10-23
Health Information and Privacy - Decision - PHIPA[1] According to the mediator’s report, the hospital claimed the exemption in section 52(1)(e)(i), which states that an individual does not have a right of access to a record of personal health information if granting access could reasonably be expected to result in a risk of serious harm to the treatment or recovery of the [...] The hospital clarified during the review that the reference to section 52(1)(e)(i) in the mediator’s report was in error and that the hospital is only relying on section 52(1)(e)(iii) to deny access to the withheld information at issue.
-
13.
MO-4698 - 2025-09-26
Access to Information Orders - OrderAfter reviewing the Mediator’s Report, my preliminary view was that the exclusion at section 52(3)3 would clearly apply to any records that would be responsive to the appellant’s request. [...] Section 8.02 states that the adjudicator may consider the information contained in the Mediator’s Report to determine whether the circumstances warrant conducting an inquiry.
-
14.
PHIPA DECISION 303 - 2025-09-19
Health Information and Privacy - Reconsideration OrderMediation did not resolve the complaint, and the complainant requested that the file be transferred to adjudication with the issuance of the Mediator’s Report, dated November 10, 2023. The file was assigned to me, and I wrote to the complainant on February 21, 2024, sharing my preliminary assessment that the complaint
-
15.
MO-4691 - 2025-09-04
Access to Information Orders - Order[25] The appellant submits part ii of the request was for an “itemized cost”, not “cost” and this was inaccurately referenced in the police’s decision letter, the Mediator’s Report and Notice of Inquiry. The appellant also submits the request was for “an electronic copy” of the information for all three parts of the [...] [37] First, I acknowledge that the appellant believes part ii of her request was incorrectly stated in the decision letters of the police, the mediator’s report and the Notice of Inquiry. However, based on my review of the appellant’s access request of March 22, 2022, I find that the request was accurately reflected in
-
16.
MO-4676 - 2025-07-17
Access to Information Orders - Order[3] After reviewing the Mediator’s Report and the chart, my preliminary view was that the chart would, by definition, be subject to the mandatory personal privacy exemption at section 14(1) of the Act. I wrote to the appellant advising him of my preliminary view and explaining my reasons for it. [...] Section 8.02 states that the adjudicator may consider the information contained in the Mediator’s Report to determine whether the circumstances warrant conducting an inquiry.
-
17.
MO-4678 - 2025-07-17
Access to Information Orders - OrderThe issue of search was not raised during the mediation stage (or included in the Mediator’s Report), nor was it canvassed during the inquiry. As a result, I do not consider the issue of search in this order.
-
18.
PO-4674 - 2025-07-09
Access to Information Orders - Order[9] While the university also submits that the appellant did not challenge the reasonableness of the university’s fee estimate, I confirm that the appellant’s appeal letter to the IPC raised this issue and the Mediator’s Report highlighted that the sole issue under appeal was the fee estimate.
-
19.
MO-4667 - 2025-06-17
Access to Information Orders - Order[10] In its representations, the appellant says that records which would respond to its request would include emails a named trustee exchanged with the HRO. The issue of whether or not the board conducted a reasonable search for responsive records was not an outstanding issue identified in the mediator’s report.
-
20.
PO-4659 - 2025-05-27
Access to Information Orders - Order[2] The revised decision letter and mediator’s report did not specify which section 13(2) exemption the ministry based its decision on, but the ministry clarified in its representations during the inquiry that it relied on section 13(2)(a).
-
21.
PO-4650 - 2025-05-02
Access to Information Orders - OrderAs the appellant only seeks access to the video footage, the other exemptions, claimed by the ministry in its access decision and referenced in the mediator’s report relating to other records were removed from the scope of this appeal.
-
22.
PO-4642-R - 2025-04-17
Access to Information Orders - OrderDuring the IPC’s mediation, the ministry confirmed that it relied on section 14(1)(c), in addition to section 14(1)(b); these two exemptions were included in the Mediator’s Report that set out the appeal issues that were sent to adjudication.
-
23.
MO-4638 - 2025-03-27
Access to Information Orders - OrderThere is no reference in the mediator’s report to any additional records being at issue. If the appellant seeks disclosure of other records, he may submit an access request relating to those records to the police.
-
24.
MO-4632 - 2025-03-04
Access to Information Orders - Order[2] The Mediator’s Report states that the police report is 5 pages but that includes a cover page and a table of contents.
-
25.
PHIPA DECISION 274 - 2025-02-25
Health Information and Privacy - Decision - PHIPAThere is no reference in the mediator’s report to the Director of Patient Safety in particular, or to a conflict of interest on the part of hospital personnel.